Every day, about 160,000 drivers make their way along Interstate 20/59 through downtown Birmingham. Itâs one of the most heavily traveled stretches of highway in the state, but itâs also accident prone and crumbling from age. The Alabama Department of Transportation is developing a plan to repair and expand the highway. But that plan has drawn a critical response from some residents, such as Stuart Oates.
Stuart Oates is the executive director of Oak Hill Cemetery, Birminghamâs oldest burial ground. Although the graveyard is an urban oasis tucked away just north of downtown, Stuart worries a proposed redesign of nearby I 20/59 will bring the rush of the city much closer.
The ALDOT plan is not finalized but at the moment it calls for widening and adding shoulders to the elevated highway through downtown. Several entrance and exit ramps between I-65 and 31st Street North would be eliminated. Meanwhile 11th Avenue North would be expanded over that same stretch, making it an access road for those driving to the city center. And 11th Avenue just happens to border Oak Hill Cemetery, separating residential neighborhoods and downtown Birmingham. Stuart Oates worries limiting access and enlarging the highway will scare people away.
âWe have people suddenly in areas of this town for the first time in decades coming out at night. And by doing this weâre cutting off an important part of the city," Oates said.
One thing is clear: I-20/59 needs work of some kind. The road carries twice as many drivers as it was initially designed for. The tight exit and on ramps forces cars, trucks, and 18-wheelers to criss-cross in a dangerous weave pattern. Around July 4th a hole opened up on the highway. Two lanes had to be closed for emergency repairs.
But a vocal group of residents says the current $300 million ALDOT plan will make traffic worse and hurt downtown development. Theyâre calling for an alternative. One idea is to redirect the interstate north. Meanwhile, an opposition group called Rethink 20/59 is circulating an online petition pushing an idea from a 2004 city master plan for the interstate to be âtrenchedâ or sunk below ground. Places such as Cincinnati and Californiaâs San Mateo County have done this. ALDOT engineer Brian Davis isnât sold.
âExpensive construction cost up front, expensive maintenance over time, and non-expandable," Davis said.
He says that they never looked into trenching the highway, but the department was part of a study conducted by the organization REV Birmingham. Davis says sinking the highway would eliminate the connection with I-65 and more than double the price.
âSo the idea on the surface to bury it to and enjoy the benefits that it would afford you â the people that like that idea donât really understand the cost that this state doesnât have," said Davis.
Davis also says the department has not conducted a study of the long-term financial impact of the plan. Thatâs not unusual says Jeffrey Brown, a professor of public planning at Florida State University. He says state officials tend to ignore any considerations that are not strictly transportation related.
âThereâs a history of state DOTs having very narrow views because their priority is to move traffic," Brown said.
Because concerns like âpublic impactâ are somewhat hard to measure, theyâre often disregarded. Brown says unless a proposal involves a high-income community or a threat of litigation, itâs not likely that the plan will be significantly altered.
Stuck in the midst of this debate are Birmingham city leaders, such as Mayor William Bell.
Bell didnât respond to an interview request for this story, but he did comment on the proposal at a recent candidate forum for city elections. Bell says it may be possible to get more funding for the project. But he echoed ALDOTâs concerns, saying that alternatives would be too problematic.
Yet one Birmingham city council member remains dead set against the ALDOT plan. Johnathan Austin represents downtown and surrounding areas most affected by the proposal. Despite communication with ALDOT, Austin says he still refuses to endorse it.
âItâs misguided," Austin said. "it lacks any input from the community and thatâs why you see such a backlash of people within the community-both the businesses and citizens that will be mostly impacted by their plan.â
Austin says he expects the state to make a formal request for the city councilâs approval in the coming months. But ultimately the state doesnât need the cityâs blessing. And with the plan to be finalized later this year and construction starting late 2014 Austin and other opponents have little time.
~Hollie Parrish, September 3, 2013